Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps://ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;75(8):1086-1095.
doi: 10.1111/anae.15093. Epub 2020 May 8.

Airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 to healthcare workers: a narrative review

N M Wilson1, A Norton2, F P Young1, D W Collins1
Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 to healthcare workers: a narrative review

N M Wilsonet al. Anaesthesia. 2020 Aug.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Healthcare workers are at risk of infection during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic. International guidance suggests direct droplet transmission is likely and airborne transmission occurs only with aerosol-generating procedures. Recommendations determining infection control measures to ensure healthcare worker safety follow these presumptions. Three mechanisms have been described for the production of smaller sized respiratory particles ('aerosols') that, if inhaled, can deposit in the distal airways. These include: laryngeal activity such as talking and coughing; high velocity gas flow; and cyclical opening and closure of terminal airways. Sneezing and coughing are effective aerosol generators, but all forms of expiration produce particles across a range of sizes. The 5-μm diameter threshold used to differentiate droplet from airborne is an over-simplification of multiple complex, poorly understood biological and physical variables. The evidence defining aerosol-generating procedures comes largely from low-quality case and cohort studies where the exact mode of transmission is unknown as aerosol production was never quantified. We propose that transmission is associated with time in proximity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-1 patients with respiratory symptoms, rather than the procedures per se. There is no proven relation between any aerosol-generating procedure with airborne viral content with the exception of bronchoscopy and suctioning. The mechanism for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 transmission is unknown but the evidence suggestive of airborne spread is growing. We speculate that infected patients who cough, have high work of breathing, increased closing capacity and altered respiratory tract lining fluid will be significant producers of pathogenic aerosols. We suggest several aerosol-generating procedures may in fact result in less pathogen aerosolisation than a dyspnoeic and coughing patient. Healthcare workers should appraise the current evidence regarding transmission and apply this to the local infection prevalence. Measures to mitigate airborne transmission should be employed at times of risk. However, the mechanisms and risk factors for transmission are largely unconfirmed. Whilst awaiting robust evidence, a precautionary approach should be considered to assure healthcare worker safety.

Keywords:COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; aerosol; airborne; transmission.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key determinants of healthcare worker aerosol transmission in spontaneously breathing patient. RTLF, respiratory tract lining fluid; HCW, healthcare worker; PPE, personal protective equipment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evidence for and against airborne transmission of Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; AGP, aerosol‐generating procedure.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

看到所有类似articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Park BJ, Peck AJ, Kuehnert MJ, et al. Lack of SARS transmission among healthcare workers, United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004; 10: 217–24. -PMC-PubMed
    1. Fowler RA, Guest CB, Lapinsky SE, et al. Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome during intubation and mechanical ventilation. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2004; 169: 1198–202. -PubMed
    1. Cheung TMT, Yam LYC, So LKY, et al. Effectiveness of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory failure in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Chest 2004; 126: 845–50. -PMC-PubMed
    1. Loeb M, McGeer A, Henry B, et al. SARS among critical care nurses, Toronto. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004; 10: 251–5. -PMC-PubMed
    1. Lau JTF, Fung KS, Wong TW, et al. SARS transmission among hospital workers in Hong Kong. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004; 10: 280–6. -PMC-PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources